Rover 416 vs Rover 216: MOT reliability compared
Updated 05 September 2026.
33.1%
Rover 216 MOT failure rate, 0.9 pts lower than Rover 416
Rover 216 is the more reliable MOT performer: 33.1% of Rover 216 MOTs fail versus 34.0% for Rover 416, a 0.9 point gap.
| Metric | Rover 416 | Rover 216 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT failure rate | 34.0% | 33.1% |
| Tests analysed | 648,529 | 445,746 |
| Most common failure | Lamps & electrical (38.6%) | Lamps & electrical (35.3%) |
Questions and answers
Which is more reliable, Rover 416 or Rover 216?
Rover 216 is the more reliable MOT performer: 33.1% of Rover 216 MOTs fail versus 34.0% for Rover 416, a 0.9 point gap.
What is the MOT failure rate of the Rover 416?
34.0% of Rover 416 MOT tests result in a failure, from 648,529 tests.
What is the MOT failure rate of the Rover 216?
33.1% of Rover 216 MOT tests result in a failure, from 445,746 tests.