Rover 25 vs Rover 216: MOT reliability compared
Updated 05 September 2026.
27.9%
Rover 25 MOT failure rate, 5.2 pts lower than Rover 216
Rover 25 is the more reliable MOT performer: 27.9% of Rover 25 MOTs fail versus 33.1% for Rover 216, a 5.2 point gap.
| Metric | Rover 25 | Rover 216 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT failure rate | 27.9% | 33.1% |
| Tests analysed | 1,786,090 | 445,746 |
| Most common failure | Lamps & electrical (32.7%) | Lamps & electrical (35.3%) |
Questions and answers
Which is more reliable, Rover 25 or Rover 216?
Rover 25 is the more reliable MOT performer: 27.9% of Rover 25 MOTs fail versus 33.1% for Rover 216, a 5.2 point gap.
What is the MOT failure rate of the Rover 25?
27.9% of Rover 25 MOT tests result in a failure, from 1,786,090 tests.
What is the MOT failure rate of the Rover 216?
33.1% of Rover 216 MOT tests result in a failure, from 445,746 tests.