Rover 216 vs Rover 620: MOT reliability compared
Updated 05 September 2026.
33.1%
Rover 216 MOT failure rate, 3.9 pts lower than Rover 620
Rover 216 is the more reliable MOT performer: 33.1% of Rover 216 MOTs fail versus 37.0% for Rover 620, a 3.9 point gap.
| Metric | Rover 216 | Rover 620 |
|---|---|---|
| MOT failure rate | 33.1% | 37.0% |
| Tests analysed | 445,746 | 377,675 |
| Most common failure | Lamps & electrical (35.3%) | Brakes (56.6%) |
Questions and answers
Which is more reliable, Rover 216 or Rover 620?
Rover 216 is the more reliable MOT performer: 33.1% of Rover 216 MOTs fail versus 37.0% for Rover 620, a 3.9 point gap.
What is the MOT failure rate of the Rover 216?
33.1% of Rover 216 MOT tests result in a failure, from 445,746 tests.
What is the MOT failure rate of the Rover 620?
37.0% of Rover 620 MOT tests result in a failure, from 377,675 tests.